翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Employment discrimination law in the United States
・ Employment Division v. Smith
・ Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006
・ Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003
・ Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003
・ Employment Equality Framework Directive
・ Employment Equality Regulations
・ Employment equity (Canada)
・ Employment fraud
・ Employment in Hong Kong
・ Employment Information Directive
・ Employment Injury Benefits Convention, 1964
・ Employment integrity testing
・ Employment Law Alliance
・ Employment Medical Advisory Service
Employment Non-Discrimination Act
・ Employment Policies Institute
・ Employment Policy Convention, 1964
・ Employment Practices Liability
・ Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988
・ Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
・ Employment Protection Act 1975
・ Employment protection legislation
・ Employment record book
・ Employment Relations Act
・ Employment Relations Act 1999
・ Employment Relations Act 1999 (Blacklists) Regulations 2010
・ Employment Relations Act 2000
・ Employment Relations Act 2004
・ Employment Rights (Dispute Resolution) Act 1998


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Employment Non-Discrimination Act : ウィキペディア英語版
Employment Non-Discrimination Act

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is legislation proposed in the United States Congress that would prohibit discrimination in hiring and employment on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by employers with at least 15 employees.
ENDA has been introduced in every Congress since 1994 except the 109th. Similar legislation has been introduced without passage since 1974.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues/nondiscrimination/timeline )〕 The bill gained its best chance at passing after the Democratic Party gained the majority after twelve years of Republican majorities in the 2006 midterm elections. In 2007, gender identity protections were added to the legislation for the first time. Some sponsors believed that even with a Democratic majority, ENDA did not have enough votes to pass the House of Representatives with transgender inclusion and dropped it from the bill, which passed the House and then died in the Senate. President George W. Bush threatened to veto the measure. LGBT advocacy organizations and the LGBT community were divided over support of the modified bill.
In 2009, following Democratic gains in the 2008 elections, and after the divisiveness of the 2007 debate, Rep. Barney Frank introduced a transgender-inclusive version of ENDA. He introduced it again in 2011, and Sen. Jeff Merkley introduced it in the Senate. On November 7, 2013, Merkley's bill passed the Senate with bipartisan support by a vote of 64–32. President Barack Obama supports the bill's passage.
==Evidence of employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity==
(詳細はurl=http://www.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/HRC_Foundation_State_of_the_Workplace_2007-2008.pdf )〕〔Evidence Discrimination based on sexual orientation occurs at a similar rate as sex and race at 4.7 per 10,000, as compared to discrimination based on sex at 5.4 and race at 6.5.〕
The Williams Institute estimates the number of LGBT employees as follows: 7 million private sector employees, 1 million state and local employees, and 200,000 employees of the federal government. Thirty percent of state and local LGB employees live in California and New York. In comparison, less than half of one half of one percent of LGB state and local employees live in Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming combined.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6cz123ww?display=all )〕 As one might expect, many of the documented complaints of discrimination by state and local governments against LGBT employees are in California and New York. Surveys that seek to document discrimination on the basis of perceived sexual orientation and/or gender identity are often conducted with a pool of self identified LGBT people, making it difficult to ascertain the impact of this type of discrimination on non-LGBT individuals.
One source of evidence for hiring discrimination against openly gay men comes from a field experiment that sent two fictitious but realistic resumes to roughly 1,700 entry-level job openings. The two resumes were very similar in terms of the applicant's qualifications, but one resume for each opening mentioned that the applicant had been part of a gay organization in college. The results showed that applicants without the gay signal had an 11.5 percent chance of being called for an interview; openly gay applicants had only a 7.2 percent chance. The callback gap varied widely according to the location of the job. Most of the overall gap detected in the study was driven by the Southern and Midwestern states in the sample – Texas, Florida, and Ohio. The Western and Northeastern states in the sample (California, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and New York) had only small and statistically insignificant callback gaps.〔(Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 586–626. )〕
Transgender people may experience higher rates of discrimination than the LGB population. A survey of transgender and gender non-conforming people conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality found 90 percent of respondents experienced harassment, mistreatment, or discrimination on the job or took actions like hiding who they are to avoid it. In comparison, a review of studies conducted by the Williams Institute in 2007 found that transgender people experienced employment discrimination at a rate 15 to 57 percent.
It is unclear whether LGBT individuals earn more or less than the general population. In a survey conducted by Harris Interactive, 38 percent of LGBT people report incomes less than $35,000, compared to 33 percent of all U.S. adults over age 18. Patrick Vaughn, general counsel for The American Family Association (AFA) argues that homosexuals as a class enjoy privileged, rather than disadvantaged, economic and cultural positions in society and that their household income is above average.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Employment Non-Discrimination Act」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.